← StrategyJourney 7, recoverWorking draft

The win-back journey

Win-back: relevance or silence, never a blast.

“Show me it's relevant to a trip I actually take, make coming back effortless, and if you can't do either, leave me alone.”

Shared working surfaces

The problem, and the job to be done

After day 60, nobody owns the customer.

Why it happens Churn is an event, not a fade: a specific unresolved grievance, a feels-rigged conclusion, or price drift against remembered cheap upgrades. A generic miss-you message answers none of them, and the return door itself sometimes fails.

The behaviour we are driving Tap through to their own route with a live price and bid within 14 days; or walk back in unaided and be recognised. Either way a transaction closes the episode and hands the comeback to Journey 1.

How entry is decided

A propensity-to-return score reads the dormant pool daily: it decides who is worth a knock, who is left in peace, and later whether a reason needs an offer.

Quiet past day 60, the day-60 hand-off, trip frequency, route historyPropensity to return, re-scored dailyPersuadable: two knocks on their route, then restOtherwise: the door and the anniversary only

The numbers that decide

2,046,603the audience: in the reactivation pool across three tiers
TBCthis journey's metric: Reactivation rate (0.24% today; the 1.5% objective's denominator is challenged, restatement open), read as a transaction within 28 days per propensity band; 14-day return-to-bid is the diagnostic, the baseline is sized with Analytics
£86,625 a year

A belief until Analytics restates the per-reactivation value (the £219.94 basis is under challenge) and reconciles it with the response ceiling; the Q3 marketing model's segment sizing, 8 Jul 2026 basis, mapped in the business case of 4 Sep 2026.

The business case and sizing · £86,625 a year at maturity
Model rowMarketableWorked volumeRateValue per customerGross a yearIncremental a year
Lapsed transactors, 91 to 240 days, value-tiered win-back (RECOVER)49,3003,500
contacted a month
5% vs 3.5% organic£55 × 2.5 months × 12 a year£288,750£86,625

Q4 2026 estimate: £7,357. Annual incremental £ × days live in Q4 ÷ 365 × the Phase 1 share (100%). Proposed launch 1 December 2026; the date is Sheran's to rule.

Ladders to Reactivation: reactivation rate 4.8% to 6%; MAU transacting 4.5%. Metric moved Transacting users %. Roadmap type New revenue. Evidence B, benchmark. Also moves Reactivation rate (30-day). Shared The anniversary send fires inside the churned pool counted under Journey 9.

DRAFT, first pass, 4 Sep 2026. Basis: Q3_Marketing_Model (24).xlsx, Initiative Sizing tab, 8 Jul 2026 basis; figures incremental of organic return, credited over average active months; rates are benchmarks until holdouts replace them. Incremental of organic return, credited over the average active months; every rate is a benchmark until a holdout replaces it.

The journey, today and proposed

channels down, moments across; a card keeps its place between Today and Proposed, so the change is the only thing that moves. Open a card for the words, the trigger and who builds it; filter by builder and outcome. Opens on the returning commuter, freshly lapsed, day 60. Every live send, listed here.
State
Show for
Outcome
On Proposed (Today is the picture before any ruling):Reworked, replaces the live sends it namesNewRetires, struck through in placeContinues (grey: not yet ruled)Waits for Phase 2Engineering fix, nothing to writeApp engineeringBackend engineeringBrazeAnalyticsDesign

What changes

one row per moment: what ships now, what waits for engineering, and who builds it, with the change type in the engineering board’s words

Each engineering-row chip is coloured by the ask: APP AND JOURNEY OWNED COMPUTED TRAIT · ANALYTICS NEW EVENT · ENGINEERING BUILDS READY · NOTHING TO BRIEF

The momentPhase 1, ships nowPhase 2, waits on engineeringWho builds it
on the map: 1 · The route-anchored win-back
The route-anchored win-back

braze push, email After day 60 of silence nobody owns the dormant customer and almost nothing reaches them.

Engineering rows D1D2D3D4D7D8

Nothing waits

Braze · Braze buildAnalytics · new model, computed traitDesign · copy and creative
on the map: 3 · The comparison anchor
The comparison anchor

email, braze in-app message One concrete reason to look again: the walk-up fare on their route today against what their last upgrade cost.

Engineering rows D1D3D7

Nothing waits

Braze · Braze buildAnalytics · computed traitDesign · copy and creative
on the map: 2 · The welcome-back landing
The welcome-back landing

braze content card A returner stops landing on the same generic cold start as everyone else: the card recognises the absence, restates that the account is as they left…

Engineering rows D2D7

Nothing waits

Braze · Braze buildAnalytics · computed traitDesign · copy and creative
on the map: 4 · The final attempt, then a genuine end
The final attempt, then a genuine end

email, braze push One last try that says so: what has changed on their route, live prices this week, and after this we stop asking.

Engineering rows D1D3D6D8

Nothing waits

Braze · Braze buildAnalytics · new model, logic changeDesign · copy and creative
on the map: 5 · The anniversary message
The anniversary message

email, braze push A year on, the one owned reminder of what they liked: the same trip, this year’s real prices, against the walk-up fare.

Engineering rows D3D5

Nothing waits

Braze · Braze buildAnalytics · computed traitDesign · copy and creative
on the map: 2 · The welcome-back landing
The live incentive card

The card retires in the go-live change, under the archiving rule.

Nothing waits

Braze · Braze build
on the map: 1 · The route-anchored win-back
Unlikely to return

The weekly-blasted deep tail is now deliberately left alone: churned one-time customers are about 80% of the stock and about 2% ever come back, so a…

Nothing waits

Analytics
on the map: 1 · The route-anchored win-back
Likely to return anyway

The one harm the record has measured is chasing customers who were coming back anyway (a bid-volume holdout on active power users read minus 11.8%).

Nothing waits

Analytics
on the map: 1 · The route-anchored win-back
The organic returner

Every read in this journey must clear organic return, not silence; sending win-backs to people already back both wastes sends and poisons the read.

Nothing waits

Marketing · copy only
The email deep tail

The deep tail stops being emailed on stale consent: sender reputation is a shared resource and the tail costs more than it could ever return.

Nothing waits

Braze · decision needed

The words are on the journey map above. A D number opens that row of the Engineering brief; the engineering board uses the same numbers. Live sends not named here continue unchanged.

What needs deciding

the questions the build waits on, from the matrix’s register; the full list with every owner is on the reference
The questionOwner
Rule the welcome-back owner: this journey fires and measures the card; the returning-customer home journey renders the surface. One owner, decided.Blocks launch Sheran, at Gate 1
Size and meter the one-time backfill wave: the persuadable band only, ranked by what a return is worth, route-stale customers left out, with the double-read holdout design.Blocks launch Analytics: Ivi and Ben
Run the frequency-band read (reactivation rate by transaction-frequency band across lapsed and churned), then size the two reverse-holdouts and the within-band holdouts from it.Blocks launch Analytics: Ivi and Ben
Restate the 1.5% reactivation objective’s denominator, and reconcile the pool counts across sources (279,876 verified against the circulating figures).Analytics: Ivi and Ben
The 24-month email deep-tail rule: confirm the working assumption (no engagement and no consent refresh in 24 months means no email).Legal
Asked 6 Sep 2026: restate what the £219.94 per-reactivation value measures; until then no offer depth is priced and the journey’s revenue figure stays labelled as a belief.Analytics: Ivi and Ben
Confirm where every button lands: sign the register 'Where every tap lands' on this matrix against the deep-link availability list, one pass for the journey (Sheran, 6 Sep 2026, ruling J5-12).Product

The asks of Analytics

Open the five asks
The Analytics brief

The formal ask, from this pack

Five asks, one of them the whole launch gate. The board is the system of record; these rows are raised there and referenced here.
#The askHand backStart here
1The propensity-to-return band into the daily sync, on the standing pattern: the frequency band on day one, the model’s output when it clears its backtest; this one extension is the whole phase 2 launch gate.The band in the sender, refresh cadence stated.The Engineering brief’s plumbing band.
2The route, from-price and anniversary traits, nightly, for this cohort.The traits live, coverage stated.The traits band on the Engineering brief.
3Size the backfill waves and the double read: holdouts within bands (journey lift) and banded waves against a batch arm (targeting value), with the underpowered-band risk stated.The wave plan and test design.The measurement position on the Campaign brief.
4Restate the 1.5% objective’s denominator and reconcile the pool counts across sources.The restated objective and one pool number.The hero figures on the Campaign brief.
5Deliverable-reach counts per channel: consent is not reach (roughly 1.8x overstatement; warehouse push consent three months stale).Reach ceilings per band and channel.The suppressed rows on the Decisioning matrix.

Every read must clear organic return: about 33,000 lapsed customers a month come back unaided and convert at new-customer rates.

Working detailPack version: 7 Sep 2026, 01:44 (London)